Luxembourg Foreign Minister Jean Asselborn doubted the deal would bring stability to the region, saying there would be no stability without a two-state solution, saying the UAE had abandoned the Palestinians with the deal. [122] The Foreign Ministry then issued a statement from it stating that it was not critical of the peace agreement, but stressed that it was important for Arabs, especially the Gulf states, to support the creation of a Palestinian state in accordance with the two-state solution. [123] On July 23, 2016, a retired Saudi general visited Israel and led a delegation of academics and businessmen who wanted to promote relations. MK Issawi Frej said the Saudis wanted to open up to Israel and that this was a strategic decision for them. He went on to explain that they wanted to continue what former Egyptian President Anwar Sadat had started (with the 1979 Israeli-Egyptian peace treaty). [9] “What we need to achieve is a peace agreement that delivers a Palestinian state with dignity and viable sovereignty that the Palestinians can accept,” Prince Faisal said in December last year. Malaysia said the agreement was a sovereign right of the UAE, but would continue to support Israel`s withdrawal from the Palestinian territories. [128] The Philippine Department of State issued a statement welcoming the agreement in the hope that it would contribute to peace and security in the Middle East. [129] In conclusion, I would like to say that relations between most Gulf states and Israel are not new or unified, but changes in regional dynamics have given some GCC members a new strategic imperative to move closer to their former adversary. Driven by a variety of regional threats and the need to ensure U.S.
security, the UAE`s Saudi axis has broken with the Arab world`s longstanding policy of first and foremost Palestine to achieve an alliance with Israel. While these states have viewed standardization as an advantage rather than a burden at this point, an open relationship is not without risks and costs that could become more apparent on the road. Oman`s government has publicly supported the deal (which it has called “historic”). [58] The Grand Mufti of Oman, Ahmed bin Hamad al-Khalili, indirectly criticized the treaty. [59] Iraqi government spokesman Ahmed Mulla Talal said that Iraq would not interfere in the sovereign affairs of other countries, but that its laws did not allow for the normalization of relations with Israel. [60] In December 2018, the Wall Street Journal wrote that Ahmad Asiri, the general believed to be at the heart of Jamal Khashoggi`s murder, was also at the heart of ties between Saudi Arabia and Israel. He had visited Israel several times and was the most senior Saudi official to do so. [31] [32] [33] On August 21, Prince Turki bin Faisal Al Saud wrote in an apparent response to Trump, who said on August 19 that he expected Saudi Arabia to join the agreement, that the price to pay for normalizing relations with Israel was the creation of a sovereign Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital.
He added that any Arab country that wants to follow in the UAE`s footsteps should demand a higher price for Israel`s peace in the future. [62] Palestinian leaders rejected the UAE Accords and other agreements, saying they wanted countries in the region to avoid agreements with Israel until the Palestinians have a state or peace agreement. But the UAE has argued that it could use its relationship with Israel to help the Palestinians. As the two sides have expanded their cooperation in recent years, these behind-the-scenes connections have inevitably become more visible. Thus, the public also became a growing part of the target for the Gulf states as they sought Washington`s approval, which in part led to the groundbreaking normalization agreements that the UAE and Bahrain struck on September 15. September 2020 at the White House with Israel and collectively marketed as the “Abraham Accords”. 2 Nevertheless, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) is far from unanimous, and the nature and scope of relations with Israel vary from one Gulf state to another. Last year`s agreements, brokered by the administration of former US President Donald Trump, included a freeze on Israel`s planned annexation of Palestinian land. An Israeli-Saudi peace deal, while not necessarily imminent, is now a real possibility. The contract was signed on September 15, 2020. The treaty recognizes the sovereignty of each state, obliges the two states to exchange ambassadors and conclude bilateral agreements on various issues, including visa agreements, and enters into force upon ratification.
[32] The agreement was signed on September 12. Ratified by the Israeli government on 15 October and ratified by the Knesset on 15 October. Saudi Arabia has played an active role in trying to put the Palestinians in a condition of autonomy that would allow for negotiations with Israel. [Citation needed] He did so mainly by trying to resolve the split between Fatah and Hamas, especially when King Abdullah invited both factions to Mecca for negotiations that led to the Mecca agreement of February 7, 2007. The deal quickly failed, but Saudi Arabia continued to support a government of national unity for the Palestinians and strongly opposed the war in Gaza in early 2009. News International reported that after consultations and after considering the pros and cons of developing Pakistan`s national interests, Pakistan will take a stand on the agreement between Israel and the UAE. He also welcomed the suspension of Israeli annexation plans and hoped that the Israeli-Palestinian dialogue would resume. [119] Contrary to the tense “cold peace” that Jordan and Egypt have with Israel, the two Gulf states are accelerating their relations with Israel. Although he was keen to call the Palestinian cause “just,” he blamed Israel and the Palestinian leadership for failing to reach a peace agreement after so many years. This inclusion of standardization is a radical change from the past.
Egypt, for example, was suspended by the Arab League for a decade after signing a peace agreement with Israel in 1979, even though its capital was home to the institution. This difference between yesterday and today probably reflects the growing influence of the Gulf States on other countries in the region; the erosion of Palestinian political influence; and the decrease in zeal associated with their cause (although this dimension is widely discussed). The Palestinians, for their part, widely regarded the normalization agreement as an act of “treason” and strongly condemned it. Nevertheless, the Palestinian leadership, led by Mahmoud Abbas, has failed in its attempt to have the agreement condemned by the Arab League.26 Tel Aviv-Yafo City Mayor Ron Huldai praised Netanyahu for the “double achievement” of peace with the United Arab Emirates and the postponement of plans to annex parts of the West Bank. [38] Huldai also illuminated Tel Aviv City Hall with the flag of the United Arab Emirates. [39] Dear contributor, this is false. Palestine is a non-MEMBER STATE of the UN and is recognized by more than 135 nations (with which it has bilateral relations). That you do not respectfully accept Palestine`s inalienable right to exist does not mean that a two-state solution should not be implemented. .